Section 8 - Exhibit 15 – filed December 30, 2003

          The exhibit in this Section is the Motion To Demand Trial By Jury. A Citizen’s trial by jury is guaranteed in the federal Constitution, either the 6^th or 7^th Amendment, as well as in each state Constitution.  Your Constitutional Rights are guaranteed in the federal and state Constitutions, specifically, in the Bills of Rights.  The Citizen must obtain a copy of the court rules to ascertain when the Motion for trial by jury is required.  In many courts, the Motion is required to be filed within 10 days after notification of suit or within so many days after your answer is filed.  Edwards had previously requested a trial by jury verbally, but did not immediately file a Motion because she thought that, based on the evidence she had in comparison to the evidence Metris had, the suit would be immediately dismissed. 

Please note that American Citizens are guaranteed a TRIAL by jury, and not TRIALS by judges.  A trial by jury is not HEARINGS by judges in which the judge makes decisions and often dismisses cases, without jury participation.  This lacks jurisdiction and due process and is more fully explained in those Sections describing the January 22^nd and April 8^th hearings.     

This and the following Motion in the next Section require the presiding judge, pursuant to his oath taken to the federal Constitution, as required by Article VI, clauses 2 and 3, and in the case of a state judge, also to the state Constitution, to grant the Motions.  If the judge were to deny these Motions, in writing, by his own court order, then he perjures his oath and denies the powers of and the Rights guaranteed in the Constitutions to an American Citizen.  The vast majority of judges are not foolish enough to deny the Constitution, in writing, and hold themselves open to prosecution and civil suit.  Harris was.

          In future cases, Edwards may combine this and the following Motion, Motion To Claim and Exercise Constitutional Rights, into one Motion.  This combination of Motions in one document requires the judge, pursuant to his oath, to grant the Constitutionally-guaranteed jury trial and also, by so doing, uphold the Citizen’s Constitutional Rights.  When such a Motion is granted, a Citizen can hold the judge and the court to that Motion and the requirements thereof.  By this, the Citizen can feel assured that his Rights will be protected.  If the court grants the Motion and then fails to protect Rights, the court can be reminded of its ruling and requirements thereunder.  When a Citizen’s Rights are protected, his evidence considered and properly ruled upon, due process provided, as required by the Motion, and the Citizen’s position is lawful, then he has an excellent chance to win. 

There is also an advantage in keeping the Motions separate.  In this manner, the three Motions in this case that require the judge to abide by his oath and uphold Rights guaranteed in the Constitution are presented in a series rather than in one combined Motion which could be denied.  Of course, any judge who were to deny such a Motion denies, in writing, by his own order, the Constitution, the powers thereof and Rights guaranteed therein.  By his own order, he commits insurrection and sedition against the Constitution and treason against the American People.  Most judges are not that stupid.  Her Motion follows on the next page.