Section 7 – Exhibit 14 – filed Dec 23, 2003

Metris made a Motion for a telephonic hearing, to which Edwards objected.  In Edwards’ opinion, Metris’ attorneys were well aware that, because of Edwards’ letters, affidavit and pleadings, their case was weak and they did not want to face Edwards, directly, in court, so opted for a telephonic hearing.  The accused has a Right to face her accuser, and that is very difficult to do over the phone.  Further, it would be difficult to present evidence over the phone in a 15 minute hearing. 

          Despite Edwards’ Objection, Harris, who is required to be fair and impartial, acted in complete opposition to those requirements, and a hearing was scheduled for January 22, 2004. 

Edwards’ Objection is found on the next page.