_________(Begin Exhibit)_________
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY
OF SAN MIGUEL
STATE
OF NEW MEXICO
Case No. 2003-188-CV
METRIS COMPANIES LLP
Plaintiff
v.
MARGARET
EDWARDS
Defendant
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR JUDGEMENT
ON THE PLEADINGS
________________________________________________________________________
COMES NOW Defendant
Edwards and responds as follows:
1.
Plaintiff Metris is not registered with the Public Regulatory Commission
to
engage in business within the State of New Mexico.
2.
Metris’ appearance in Court is therefore deceptive; the deception is by
and
3.
Paragraph 3 of Metris’ motion declares no genuine issue exists as to a
4.
The Court has been apprised of the foregoing and Paragraph 3 of Metris’
5.
In view of the foregoing, Edwards disagrees, but alleges the law offices
are subject to the provisions of NMSA
36-2-17, with
respect to her; and subject to the
WHEREFORE, the motion for
judgment on the pleadings must be denied;
however, the actions required of the Court pursuant
to NMSA 36-2-16 and 17
are
Respectfully submitted,
All Rights Reserved
______________________________
Margaret D. Edwards
739 Dalbey Drive
Las
Vegas, New Mexico 87701
(505) 425-0659
I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing response to motion for judgment on the pleadings was sent first class by U. S. Mail, postage prepaid, to Catherine Sanchez, Esq., Post Office Box 37290, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87176 this ____ day of September, 2003.
_______________________________
Margaret Edwards