Please note that the following Motion and the Brief in support thereof, which are exhibits to the Motion For Rulings Based In the Constitution, were Motions filed in a Federal District Court case.  These pleadings are long, but were filed on the public record to demonstrate requirements imposed upon judges to abide by their oaths, the law, the Constitution, Rights guaranteed therein and courts rules.  Most judges have forgotten their duties, never knew them, or know them and act in defiance of those duties.  American Citizens must claim their Rights in court, both verbally and by pleadings, specify the duties of the judge, and demand that their Rights be upheld, or they will most likely not have them upheld.  These pleadings, although long, lawfully position Constitutional Rights guaranteed to Citizens and required duties of judges.

          The Citizen who filed this action in federal court was fired by a state agency, without authority, without justification, as determined by the State Personnel Board.  She was also fired while on Family Medical Leave, prohibited by federal law.  The judge dismissed her case, citing immunity provided the state by the 11th Amendment.  This Amendment provides no such immunity, as specified in the pleadings.  The Plaintiff filed these pleadings in one federal case, used them as exhibits in another federal case and was  threatened by the other federal judge and court with sanctions if she filed further motions claiming her Rights and specifying duties of the judge.  She remains nameless.  Federal courts are sworn to uphold Citizens’ Rights, yet this court and judge actually threatened a Sovereign American Citizen who claimed her Constitutionally guaranteed Rights.  If American Citizens and their government allow the courts to openly threaten Citizens for claiming their Rights, do you see any difference between our government and dictatorships that deny their Citizens their Rights, under color of law?         

                Exhibits A & B follow on the next pages: